DigiCare Hearing Research & Rehabilitation

HIPAA Statement


Copyright © 2008

 

 

 

 
Miracell: Video Otoscopy Observations in Practice

Readers may contact us at digicare@aol.com. Include your name, mailing address, and telephone number for a personal reply. No replies are given over the internet.

DigiCare® Hearing Research & Rehabilitation

VIDEO OTOSCOPY OBSERVATIONS IN HEARING HEALTH PRACTICE UTILIZING MIRACELL BOTANICALS SOLUTION

by Max Stanley Chartrand

(Note: The published versions of this article contain a number of illustrations that we could not put on this site.)

Introduction
Over a 20-month period we observed marked physical changes in the external and middle ears in many of the 960 hearing impaired patients who followed a specified regimen with Miracell Botanicals solution. From video otoscopic and comparative history data gathered during these observations, we noted repeatable trends relative to the physical status of the ear and its plasticity over time.
Our initial objectives were to test this botanical product for safety, and to ascertain its suitability for preparing otherwise “non-medically treatable” ears1 (under FDA Red Flags) for the successful adaptation to acoustic couplers. However, during the course of “before” and “after” video otoscopic observations we also found that most ears with:

o Shallow-A tympanograms returned to “normal A”
o Adhesive otitis residue on tympanic membranes returned to normal, opaque tissue
o Stress cracks and fissures healed over
o Small air-bone gaps at the TM returned to normal compliance
o Chronic fungus, yeast, bacteria lining the ear canal returned to normal pH
o Missing keratin and other epithelial disturbances returned to normal
o Partially healed perforations grew back the middle fibrous layer of tissue
o Overly flaccid pars flaccidae returned to normal state

The above are just a few of the dramatic non-medically treatable improvements we saw in the course of simply attempting to prepare patients for new hearing instruments or earmolds. Through these observations we have adjusted our regimen time for each patient, from 10-14 days for relatively “normal” ears, which may simply be missing the keratin layer, and up to 30 days’ use for cases of long-term scar tissue, adhesive otitis residue, calcium plaque, acoustic trauma, and those with very shallow A tympanograms.
It must be pointed out, though, that we were unable to make any specific prognostic claims regarding the use of this product, for it has not yet undergone efficacy studies. However, repeated experience and empirical observation with so many patients has led us to promote the universal use for every case of new users as they prepare to take delivery of new hearing instruments, and in ongoing patients who are experiencing discomfort, itching or maladaptation problems with their current hearing instruments. We’ve also instituted a well-defined procedure for modification of ear impressions BEFORE sending to the factory. Universal Miracell utilization combined with ear impression modification has helped reduce remakes in participating practices to less than 5% and RFC to less than 2%.

I. MISSING PROTECTIVE KERATIN LAYER

One of the universal paradoxes of modern hygiene is the use (or abuse) of cotton swabs in the external meatus.2 Indeed, it is not uncommon for a patient to inform us---during otoscopy ---that they tried to get their ears “clean” before coming to our office. Translated, this means they virtually reamed out their ears with a Q-tip or some other cotton swab, scraping off nearly all of the protective keratin layer (or keratinocytes)3 and even some of the epithelial cells from their ear canals---the worst possible state for adapting to new hearing aids.
In so doing, they’ve set up their external canals for possible infection, and most certainly for over-sensitivity in up to three of the four neuroreflexes that affect, or even inhibit, adaptation to the physical fit of today’s earmolds.4, 5 Indeed, we’ve found these to comprise the largest segment of failed trials and “mystery cases” too often encountered in the hearing instrument industry.
What’s tragic about this finding is that it appears that few in our profession are even aware of the existence and importance of these physical landmarks, keratin least of all. Though keratin itself, in biological makeup, is essentially inorganic (like hair---non-vascularized, non-innervated), this important protein shields the ear canal from the growth of bacteria, fungus, yeast, pseudomonas and other parasites, and helps maintains the ear’s natural 5.2-7.0 pH environment by mixing apocrine (cerumen) and sebaceous secretions into earwax.
Keratin also allows the “desquamated” growth of epithelial cells beneath to migrate outward from the tympanic membrane to the outer edge of the aperture or opening of the ear canal. This conveyor belt-like mechanism then “lifts” (by way of hair follicles) the keratin, along with its collection of earwax, debris and desquamated cells, just prior to reaching the aperture of the concha area6 for easy removal. By this process, the ears are “self-cleaning” and not in need of mechanical “cleaning” per se, unless, of course, one mechanically “impacts” earwax deeply into the canal.
We’ve also identified at least three neuroreflexes---vagus (cough/occlusion), tympanic plexus (red reflex), and lymphatic (swelling reaction to pressure) in the cartilaginous area of the canal that tend to act as “tripwires” for adaptation to hearing aids and acoustic couplers. When protective keratin has been removed by “cleaning” the ears these neuroreflexes are laid bare for oversensitivity, and the invading hearing aid or coupler becomes a “foreign object” as far as the neurological system is concerned. In fact, just the act of making an ear impression often removes so much keratin that few ears---left untreated---will have enough keratin grown back by delivery time to be able to cushion the ear prosthesis from “own voice”, “too long”, and “fuzzy sound” complaints--- complaints derived by exposure of the above-described reflexes7.
Moreover, by following a uniform regimen of at least two weeks’ use of Miracell by EVERY new patient, we have been able to reduce remake rates to less than 5% and RFC to about 2%. Of those in our DigiCare Network, who’ve also adopted using Miracell as standard procedure, similar experiences are reported. Later in this paper I will discuss the procedures involved.

II. ADHESIVE OTITIS RESIDUE

Some of the most dramatic cases of improvement while utilizing Miracell botanical were observed in the changes that occurred with TMs thickened as a result of long-standing residue of adhesive otitis media (glue ear).8 In most cases, the incidence of chronic otitis media had occurred during the patient’s first three years of life, age 0-3 years. Imagine, if you will, seeing an 82 year-old patient with residue resulting from chronic OME (untreated) that occurred during early childhood! Yet this phenomena can be commonly observed in the hearing impaired population.
In a typical case of adhesive otitis residue, tympanograms were A-shallow, accompanied with complaints of painful barotrauma during sudden altitude changes. Compliance at the TM is simply not flexible enough to take up the slack between Eustachian tube pressure equalizations (about every third or fourth swallow). Appearance at the TM is generally opaque with yellow-orange patches appearing from the mucosal side of the TM. Most educational illustrations of these ears are simply referred to as “normal”, but after having seen so many of these lose the yellow-orange residue after 2-4 weeks’ use of Miracell we are convinced that these are anything but “normal”. The resulting compliance changes during Tympanometry have convinced us that these are not “static states” of the TM, and that they can be non-medically remedied.
It appears that the ingredients in Miracell penetrate through at least 7 layers of tissue. In the case of the TM there are only three (epithelial, fibrous & mucosal), a relatively gossamer structure9 through which Miracell ingredients can do their work. In the process of inspiring accelerated epithelial cell growth it appears that the residue and scar tissue of past (untreated) infections “sloughs off” and is replaced with new, pristine tissue, even down to the mucosal layer. Compliance returns as air pressure distribution between the pars flaccida and pars tensa equalizes, at least without the degree of contrast found in the pre-treated state.
Other benefits of this process, as will also be noted in cases of tympanosclerosis et al, are:

o Reduced impedance at the TM; amplification is more efficient with less transform distortion
o More normal loudness growth at the TM and throughout the ossicular chain
o Reports of own-voice quality improvements
o Reduction of minor air-bone gaps (<10dB)
o Better wide range fidelity at the TM (if the aid’s receiver is within 3/8” of the TM)

That last benefit apparently is the result of involving the TM as the “speaker” that resonates at the lowest possible fundamental (at about 20Hz in younger adults, 40-50Hz in the older adults). When the lower end of fundamental resonance is expanded via amplification there is also a converse extension in the high frequency harmonics, as well. In fact, the lower the fundamental resonance at the TM the higher potential resonance at the other end of the frequency spectrum. Otherwise, adhesive otitis residues tend to dampen the potential range for both low fundamentals and high harmonic response at the TM. Thus, the artificial narrowing of the range of resonance at the TM can contribute to a further reduction of spatial bandwidth in cases of hearing impairment.

III. CALCIUM PLAQUE (TYMPANOSCLEROSIS)

Because of the rapid increase in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis in the general population today, many physicians are recommending mega doses of calcium supplements to patients. While superficially we find this a good recommendation, the problem now exists that the type of calcium recommended or the pH states of the physical body of those taking the extra calcium is dramatically increasing the amount of “free calcium” in their systems.
Free calcium is calcium that is absent an ionic charge, or cannot be easily absorbed into the bones. Studies show that many commercially prepared calcium supplements have very poor absorption rates.11, 12 The question is where does the rest of that calcium go? It can be argued that unabsorbed free calcium contributes to eardrum plaque, hardened cholesterol plaque and kidney stones.13

Where this brings us in oto-health is that the extra unabsorbed calcium appears to be causing an inordinate rise in cases of tympanosclerosis and skelatonization of the TM10, and increased progressiveness in some cases of otosclerosis.8 This can be visually through video otoscopy as white or gray plaque on the TM, or by patient reports of discomfort during sudden air pressure changes, and by shallow A tympanogram. It also evidenced, but not as easily measured, in some cases of extremely rapid loudness growth from SRT to MCL (i.e., SRT=55dB, MCL=65dB). This milder form of tympanosclerosis, generally considered medically untreatable, causes other complications in hearing aid fitting, is suspected in reducing fidelity and amplification clarity.
Miracell Botanicals enters the picture in these cases by being utilized daily for a period of 2-4 weeks, depending upon TM compliance readings (via tympanometry). It has been noted that most, if not all, of the plaques come off the TMs, starting with patches of clear tissue and progressively involving the remainder of TM surface. Participants of our Tinnitus & Amplification 2002 Study15, who were also found to have objective tinnitus and significant TM calcium plaques, and where medical treatment had already been ruled out, were often recommended an ionically-charged calcium supplement taken in conjunction with external Miracell application. These cases appeared to exhibit tinnitus aggravated or magnified by otosclerosis and tympanosclerosis, and consequently generally reported a lessening of some component of their tinnitus.

IV. STRESS CRACKS/FISSURES & SMALL PERFORATIONS AT THE TM

Obscure in the literature but prevalent in the hearing impaired population are stress fissures on the tympanic membrane as a result of a variety of events, such as acoustic or mechanical trauma, barotrauma, aerotitis media, or other non-medically treatable events16, 17, 18. Left in the wake of such stress upon the delicate hearing structure are cracks in the TM that prevent tympanometry compliance tests until healed over. But the problem is that in cases where calcium plaque fills the scar tissue over time, often result in uneven resonance across the surface of the TM.
During the course of using Miracell botanical solution we observed that these scars disappeared in most cases as new epithelium rapidly grew in its place. In many cases, the cracks and fissures completely disappeared. This was an entirely unexpected bonus for our patients, who also noted that sound resonated more naturally. Complaints of chronic fullness or dullness also resolved where TM scar tissue appeared to be the cause. In a few cases, air conduction scores rose by 5-10dB in the low frequencies, often reducing the small but important air-bone gaps after a period of use.

V. EXCELLENT EAR CARE TRAINING FOR PATIENTS

By utilizing Miracell in the recommended manner, patients enjoy a valuable educational experience in the care of their ears.4 They learn about the ear and what is proper for its ongoing care. They learn about the several reflexes that heretofore have gone unmentioned, but which can trip up their success with prosthetic amplification. They learn good oto-health habits that will stay with them for years to come. When using cotton swabs, they understand how to avoid trauma to the ear canal by not inserting to depths past the aperture of the ear canal opening. They also learn of and avoid:

o The tissue devastation that occurs when using hydrogen peroxide solutions
o Boric acid and other harsh solutions when ears itch from regular contact with water
o All probing objects that can introduce bacteria, yeast and fungus, including unclean ear plugs
o Exposure to loud noise and acoustic trauma
o Sudden altitude and pressure changes that can decimate ear structures
o Ear candles and other home remedies that harm the ear
o Calcium supplements that promote an abundance of “free calcium” plaque

PROCEDURE FOR USE SIMPLE, BUT CRITICAL

Hearing aid patients are instructed to literally “inundate” the eardrum with the solution, as any amount less will not reach the necessary structures of the ear. The standard time of use is 10-14 days prior to receiving new hearing aids or earmolds. But in cases where such so-called “normalities” as absent keratin, mild tympanosclerosis, adhesive otitis residue, etc. are observed during video otoscopy, a 2-4 week course is recommended.
Instructions for use of Miracell Botanicals solution are as follows:

1. Remove cap from container
2. Tilt head to the side, and pour a generous amount into each ear until one feels the solution on the eardrum
3. Place a wad of tissue paper at the opening of the ear to keep fluid from running back out
4. Leave tissue in ears for a period of about 15-20 minutes before removing
5. Repeat procedure once each day during the recommended period of time

In conclusion, we’ve tried this same procedure with various other products, and have found none to inspire the kind of benefits experienced with Miracell Botanicals. Indeed, other common preparations were either caustic to ear tissues, lowered pH flora or closed off air circulation to tissues (i.e., mineral oil). Like about a dozen other products used regularly in dispensing practice, Miracell does not require a prescription nor is its use the practice of medicine. It is simply a common sense approach to making hearing aid fittings more comfortable and auditory rehabilitation programs more effective.


Dr. Chartrand is director of research for DigiCare Hearing Research & Rehabilitation, Rye, Colorado, and a recognized professional education instructor in the hearing industry. Contact: www.digicare.org.


References

1. Chartrand, M.S., “Video Otoscopy Observation & Referral: The FDA Red Flags”, Hearing Professional, Jan-Feb, 2003, pp. 9-14 (2003)
2. Chartrand, M.S., “But What’s Wrong with Q-tips®?”, Archives, Audiology Online Newsletter: www.audiologyonline.com, January (2003).
3. Johnson A., and Hawke, M., “The nonauditory physiology of the external ear”, from Physiology of the Ear, eds. A.F., and Santos-Sacchi, J., Raven Press: New York, pp 41-58 (1988).
4. Chartrand, M.S., “Basic Course in External Ear Care”, Hearing Library, DigiCare Hearing Research & Rehabilitation: www.digicare.org (2002).
5. McSpaden, J. B., and McSpaden-Hickock, D.K., and Hickock, R.L., “More than everything you wanted to know about non-acoustic occlusion and venting,” Audecibel, Jan-Mar (1993).
6. Hawke, M., “Atlas of Clinical Otoscopy”, Modern Medicine of Canada, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 303-310, March (1981).
7. Chartrand, M.S., and Chartrand, G.A., The Nuts & Bolts of Auditory Rehabilitation, Continuing education course for the International Institute for Hearing Instruments Studies: Livonia, MI (2002).
8. Katzenmeyer, K., Vrabec, J., and Quinn, F.B., “Otosclerosis”, Grand Rounds Presentation, UTMB, Department of Otolaryngology, October 27 (1999).
9. Sundstrom, J., and Mulligan, K., Neuroanatomy Interactive Syllabus; Ch. 7: Auditory System, University of Washington (2002).
10. Encyclopaedia of Medical Imaging, Volume VI:2, Amersham Health, (2002).
11. Kohls K., Kies C., “Calcium bioavailability: A comparison of several different commercially available calcium supplements”, J Appl Nutr 44: 50-62 (1992)
12. Heaney R.P., Recker R.R., and Weaver C.M., “Absorbability of calcium sources: the limited role of solubility”, Calcific Tissue Int, 46: 300-304 (1990).
13. Quinones, A., “EDTA Chelation and Calcium”, www.anitafinley.com, (2000)
14. Calcium with ionic charge (benefits)
15. Tinnitus & Amplification Study 2002, Prospectus, Hearing Library, www.digicare.org, (2003)
16. Middle Ear Barotrauma, www.scuba-doc.com/midearbt.html, (2003) Ditto
17. Slattery, WH III, and Saadat, P., “Postinflammatory medial canal fibrosis”, Am J Otol, 18:294-297, (1997)
18. Roland, P.S., “Chronic External Otitis”, Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, June Supplement, (2001).

Contact

Upcoming Events


Home  |  About Us  |  Our Staff  |  Hearing FAQs |  Contact Us  |  Links  |  News  |  Code of Ethics  |  Digicare Library  |  Professional Training